Poster Presentation Joint 2016 COSA and ANZBCTG Annual Scientific Meeting

Outcomes by Site of Metastasis for Patients With Radioiodine-refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib Versus Placebo: Results from a Phase 3, Randomized Trial (#262)

Louise Young 1 , Mouhammed Habra 2
  1. Eisai Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  2. Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America

Aim

In the phase 3 study of patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), lenvatinib prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo (18.3 vs 3.6 months; HR: 0.21; 99% CI 0.14–0.31; P<0.001). This subanalysis examines efficacy by baseline metastasis site.

Methods

Patients with progressive RR-DTC were randomized 2:1 to lenvatinib 24 mg/day or placebo. Tumor assessments performed at baseline and every 8 weeks were independently evaluated using RECIST version 1.1.

Results

Of 392 patients, 388 (99.0%) had ≥1 metastatic site (1, n=96; 2, n=134; 3, n=107, ≥4, n=51); 34% and 66% had follicular and papillary histologies, respectively. Median PFS for patients with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 sites was not reached; 18.3, 16.5, and 11.0 months, respectively, for lenvatinib; and 3.7, 3.7, 3.6, and 2.0 months, respectively, for placebo. Overall response rates were: brain 66.7% (6/9), bone 51.0% (53/104), liver 51.2% (22/43), lung 68.1% (154/226), and lymph node 65.2% (90/138); patients could have ≥1 metastatic site. There were 16 patients with brain (PFS for lenvatinib vs placebo: 8.8 vs 3.7 months; HR: 1.00), 376 without brain (18.7 vs. 3.6; HR: 0.21), 152 with bone (14.8 vs 2.1; HR: 0.26); 240 without bone (20.2 vs 3.7; HR: 0.18), 71 with liver (7.6 vs 3.7; HR: 0.51), 321 without liver (20.2 vs 3.6; HR: 0.17), 350 with lung (18.7 vs 3.6; HR: 0.21), 42 without lung (14.8 vs 3.6; HR: 0.24), 202 with lymph node (14.8 vs 3.6; HR: 0.24) and 190 without lymph node metastasis (not estimable vs 3.6; HR: 0.24). Differences between subgroups for lenvatinib were less evident for placebo.

Conclusion

For these metastasis sites, response rates were >50% and PFS benefit with lenvatinib was preserved in all but the brain subgroup. These findings suggest greater lenvatinib treatment benefit in patients with better prognosis, as defined by metastatic site.